An interesting perspective on the Microsoft takeover bid of Yahoo!. It reënforces the theory of my collaborator, Phil, who asserts that great vision can survive poor design*, but great design cannot save poor vision†. From the article:
† e.g. WebVan
Designers and enlightened business thinkers alike are fond of touting the strategic importance of design, the competitive edge that a strong design sense can provide to a business. I’m a believer in that logic, but given Yahoo’s less than flattering position as an ailing company subject to the whims of stronger players, I have to ask: “did design make a difference?”. Yahoo had a very good design sense. Actually, Yahoo had great design sense. And it apparently didn’t help them.* e.g. plentyoffish.com
† e.g. WebVan

Leave a comment